An examination of the anti religious writings of richard dawkins

Explaining the Human Side of Religion. The God Delusion is a work of theater rather than scholarship -- a fierce, rhetorical assault on religion and passionate plea for it to be banished to the lunatic fringes of society, where it can do no harm.

Dawkins' God: From The Selfish Gene to The God Delusion

Believers wrongly accuse Dawkins of being himself a fundamentalist, a fundamentalist atheist. The clouds are darkening around tolerance. The horrors of the first and second world wars not only punctured the promises of secular nationalism in the West. Objection Two If we don't need to invoke God as an explanatory principle for anything, and we have no evidence for his existence, it's pretty likely he doesn't exist.

For example, Stalin's regime, in addition to directly or indirectly killing millions of Russian citizens, also methodically closed or destroyed thousands of Greek Orthodox churches, and killed hundreds of priests.

Hitchens implies that the best antidote to religious extremism is to get rid of religion in all its forms. Michael Ruse, a highly respected philosopher of science and hardly a devout Judeo-Christian himselfcomments as follows [ Ruse ]: He cites his own concept, the meme, the social equivalent of the gene, as the way ideas are spread and handed down.

Fifty-five priests were executed on a single day in [ Dickinson ; Brown ]. Many of these criticisms are admittedly amateurish, defensive, polemic and, in general, of rather poor quality, based on the standards of serious scholarship. There are plenty of places where religion does not keep off the scientific turf.

Is the sexual slave trade not that bad, since misogyny and exploitation are the real problems? But it often seems like if any atheist says "I don't believe in your religion" they are a "militant atheist", which is completely unfair.

This is, obviously, an odd thing to say about a book-length investigation into God. Science is a particular bunch of tools that have been conspicuously successful for understanding and manipulating the material universe.

Like every first-year undergraduate in philosophy, Dawkins thinks he can put to rest the causal argument for God's existence. Brian Davies British mathematician [ Daviesbpg. The Pope is, of course, held to be infallible by the Catholic church.

These popularisations then led to the emergence of memeticsa field from which Dawkins has distanced himself. Christian groups on US campuses are even now campaigning against anti-discrimination laws that protect homosexuals.

In his more recent book, The Fallacy of Fine Tuning, Stenger responds to claims that a supreme creator fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life, by fundamentally countering the claim that the universe is fine-tuned at all [ Stenger ].

As human beings, we are groping for knowledge and understanding of the strange universe into which we are born.

Judgment day

Religions have the secular world running scared. Along this line, it is worth pointing out that contrary to Dawkins' claim, atheistic figures and movements have also wreaked considerable havoc throughout history.

Withdrawing it form rational enquiry effectively makes God a meaningless idea. The issue, then is not whether God is probable but whether God is actual. It is obviously no solution to postulate something even more improbable". Christopher Hitchens declares that religion is "violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism, tribalism, and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children" [ Hitchenspg.

The third issue is the persistent cultural prejudice against atheism in the United States. He doesn't comprehend that for many people reasoned argument is not the final arbiter of how they choose to live their lives. Artifical selection doesn't invalidate evolution. And he makes none of these!

In a recent book, Dawkins took on a rather different topic, with mixed results.

An examination of the anti religious writings of richard dawkins

On the contrary, they recognized the inherent value of religious belief in fostering social cohesion and maintaining order, and so sought a means of replacing religion as the basis for making moral judgments in European society.

Moreover, they were not based on his thinking about the origin of species, but on the problem of theodicy, which was exempliied in the death of his ten-year-old daughter annie: Approximately 25, priests, who refused to swear allegiance to the new regime after it confiscated the church's property, fled to other lands.Among his previous books are The Ancestor’s Tale, The Selfish Gene, The Blind Watchmaker, Climbing Mount Improbable, Unweaving the Rainbow, and A Devil’s Chaplain.

Dawkins lives in Oxford with his wife, the actress and artist Lalla Ward.4/5(79). Their argument is over nothing less than the coexistence of religion and science. Higgs has chosen to cap his remarkable with another bang by criticising the "fundamentalist" approach taken by Dawkins in dealing with religious believers.

Richard Dawkins

"What Dawkins does too. In his book The God Delusion Dawkins proposes that a belief in God is an accidental by-product of evolution, a "mis-firing of something useful" [Dawkins, pg. ]. Elsewhere he has written that a belief in God is somehow a "virus of the mind.".

Nov 01,  · A fully updated new edition of a critically acclaimed examination of the theories and writings of Richard Dawkins by a world-renowned expert on the relation of science and religion/5(27). The four most prominent authors are Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, vol.

11, pg. ]. Anti-religious violence, conducted specifically in an attempt to eradicate religion, continued even into the 20th century. Here and there one can find some conciliatory.

Judgment day

To make one part of the audience offended and to make another part rally behind her with anti-religious fervor? The point of discussing things like religion and memes scientifically is to try and be objective and rational. Richard Dawkins: “I believe a sufficient case has been made that the analogy between genes and memes is persuasive.

An examination of the anti religious writings of richard dawkins
Rated 0/5 based on 28 review