An argument against the idea of human cloning

Once the embryo is approximately five days old, the stem cells are removed, cultured, differentiated to the desired type of body cell, and inserted back into the patient the genetic donor in this case. Would anybody actually propose that the genetically damaged embryo be grown to full term, rather than cloning the existing person?

It is well established that behavioural and phenotypic characteristics of clones are not identical to their alter ego, so this argument against human clones has no basis in science. While I thought the emotional argument Kass posed was strong, he does not leave it to stand-alone.

Therefore, a categorical ban on SCNT affects not just the prospect of reproductive cloning, but also the research that could be done with cloned embryos.

I The Failed Case Against Cloning

Genetic duplication and identical multiples. So the best way to answer this human cloning essay is probably to look at both sides of the issue as has been done in the model answer. Keith Campbell successfully cloned two mountain sheep, Megan and Morag, from embryonic sheep cells.

Never let me clone?: Countering an ethical argument against the reproductive cloning of humans

As people age, their organs can fail so they need replacing. In addition, they would be unusually at risk of genetic defects, though they would still, probably, have lives worth living. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning 1. Faulting cloning for the misconceptions of others.

Last modified May 15, Also, dilemmas would arise over what rights these people have, as surely they would be humans just like the rest of us.

As always, you must read the question carefully to make sure you answer it fully and do not go off topic. The embryo is then induced to divide into genetic copies of itself, thereby artificially mimicking what happens when monozygotic multiples are formed Illmensee et al.

A chemist, who was presenting her views in support of reproductive cloning, read a letter by a father grieving the death of his infant son. Kass understands that revulsion is not entirely a valid argument, since there are plenty of examples of things that our ancestors would have been repulsed now that we see perfectly normal.

Further, this argument appropriates the phrase "genetically related" to embrace a condition that has never before occurred in human history, one which abolishes the genetic variations that have always existed between parent and child.

If you write about other issues to do with human cloning, you may go off topic. Martha Nussbaum and Cass Sunstein eds. Policy and social changes that protect lesbian and gay families are a much more pressing need.

Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cells

Attack of the Clonesas products of scientific experiments that have gone horribly wrong, resulting in deformed quasi-humans Alien Resurrection or murderous children Godsendas persons created simply for spare parts for their respective genetic predecessor The Islandor as deliberate recreations of famous persons from the past who are expected to act just like their respective predecessor The Boys from Brazil.

Additionally, if the reason people treat cloned children unfavorably is due to their misconceptions about cloning, then the proper response is not to ban cloning at the expense of compromising procreative liberty, but rather work to rectify these prejudices and misconceptions Burley and Harris, The Moral and Legal Debate.

Arguments Against Cloning

Facts and Fantasies About Human Cloning. But this is too vague; humans constantly interfere with nature in ways that are not morally criticized.

The nucleus of a mature and unfertilized egg is removed and replaced with a nucleus obtained from a specialized cell of an adult organism, which contains almost all the hereditary material. One current obstacle for the successful use of embryonic stem cells for disease therapy concerns immunological rejection.There are plenty of arguments against cloning - especially against cloning humans - ranging from scientific issues, to the practicality of cloning, to religious objections.

On the scientific side, we see that a large percentage of cloning efforts end in failure. Countering an ethical argument against the reproductive cloning of humans Yvette Pearson 1 (Author photo) 1 Yvette Pearson is Co-Director of the Institute for Ethics and Public Affairs in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.

Countering an ethical argument against the reproductive cloning of humans. Yvette Pearson 1 Tannert endeavours to provide us with a sound argument that human reproductive cloning “violates our basic moral principles”.

In an article on the pros and cons of human reproductive cloning, Dan Brock reminds us that the idea of a unique. Argument Against Human Cloning essays The idea of cloning humans has always stirred debate, raising moral and ethical issues.

As research and experiments continue delve into the frontiers of technology and science, we inch closer to the possibility of cloning becoming a reality. The argument we shall develop in the next section counts against other assisted reproductive technologies just as it does against cloning, and our conclusion from part 1 is that the moral issues concerning cloning are not unique to it.

The predominate theme underlying arguments against human cloning is that the cloned child would undergo some sort of physical, social, mental, or emotional harm. Because of these and other concerns, the United Nations and many countries have banned human cloning.

An argument against the idea of human cloning
Rated 5/5 based on 30 review